Line: 1 to 1 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
p. 5: Alternative one can determine muon distribution as function of time as f(z,t)= Integral[ g(z') rho(z-z',t) dz'] where g(z') is the accepted muon stopping distribution on anode i. It we define z=0 as the 2 mm upstream from the i anode, the time distributions would be n_k=Integral[f(z,t) dz, {z, w*k, w*(k+1)}] where k= -1,0,1. So there is no detector resolution function, but the only fit parameters account for the shape of g(z). This formulation should be compared. p. 6 It is not clear to me why eps_-1 is not equal eps_+1 after summation. p.8 The multi EVH analysis seems consistent, once one takes the mean z. What is the fraction of multi EVH ? p.5: why does the figure capture say fit, is not that data? p.16: the del Z= +-2 are a nice prediction, does that agree with the data? Finally, what is the prediction for a del Y analysis, based on the neutron timing for the capture events? |