Difference: MuDetTomReply (1 vs. 2)

Revision 22011-04-21 - PeterWinter

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="GeneralPK"
Deleted:
<
<

-- PeterKammel - 15 Feb 2007

My most recent report on entrance muon detector inefficiencies dates from 5/9/06:

http://weak0.physics.berkeley.edu/weakint/research/muons/private/tbanks_dir/Documents/UCB-Run8-updated-results-v2.pdf

If I had the luxury of time, I would run high-stat MC simulations again with the following improvements:

1. Reduce the deadtime from 12 ns -> 7 ns, and eliminate the 40% muPC1 "recovery fraction." Of course, this would probably have almost no effect on the fit results, because both 7 and 12 ns are far below the fit start time of 100 ns, and 12*.6 ~ 7 anyways. 2. Reduce the time-independent inefficiency from 34 ppm -> 8 ppm, in light of the results presented in http://weak0.physics.berkeley.edu/weakint/research/muons/private/tbanks_dir/TeleConf/2006Jun27/2006Jun27_updated.html The earlier inefficiency estimate of 34 ppm was based on drift histograms which included muon TPC stop candidates before fiducial cuts were applied, so I think the 34 ppm contains a lot of background junk. This means that my existing MC t-indep estimates are a very conservative 4x too high. 3. The MC code now has the capability to look at a wider breakdown of lifetime spectra background and signal contributions (pure and pure+wallstop decay signals, TIIE ABG, TDIE ABG, etc.), which would enable the disentanglgin of contributions which Peter was asking for. I have run this improved MC configuration only once with Run8 (2e9) stats: http://weak0.physics.berkeley.edu/weakint/research/muons/private/tbanks_dir/TeleConf/2006Dec12/2006Dec12.html

Finally, concerning the hypothesis that the mysterious tail in the right-hand accidental background of the drift distribution is due to deadtimes: I first raised this possibility by voice only (10/4/05 teleconf?), in the very early days of my studies and before I had time to consider the MC results more carefully. By the next teleconference I had already discarded the idea:

http://weak0.physics.berkeley.edu/weakint/research/muons/private/tbanks_dir/TeleConf/2005Oct11/2005Oct11.html

Figures 5 and 6 are the plots of interest, and I conclude that

"... it appears that a simple 30 ns deadtime isn't sufficient to replicate what we see in the Run8 drift distribution (Figure 4); you need a longer [mus] deadtime in order to see some accidental BG "spill" over into the gap between the drift distribution and pileup background."

For Peter K.: You were asking about the evidence of deadtime in the drift plots, which I present in Figures 11 and 12 of my 5/9/06 report. My October 11, 2005 worklog page above gives more explanation which you might find helpful:

"The 30 ns deadtime certainly produces a nonuniform accidental BG--it basically generates a miniature copy of the drift signal distribution. I would guess that the t-dependent accidental BG is a convolution of the drift peak with a square pulse of width=deadtime."

This is what you are seeing the in the red histogram bins underneath the main coincidence peak in Figures 11 and 12.

Regards, Tom

 \ No newline at end of file
Added:
>
>
Please go to https://muon.npl.washington.edu/twiki/bin/view/Main/MuDetTomReply
 \ No newline at end of file

Revision 12007-02-15 - PeterKammel

Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="GeneralPK"

-- PeterKammel - 15 Feb 2007

My most recent report on entrance muon detector inefficiencies dates from 5/9/06:

http://weak0.physics.berkeley.edu/weakint/research/muons/private/tbanks_dir/Documents/UCB-Run8-updated-results-v2.pdf

If I had the luxury of time, I would run high-stat MC simulations again with the following improvements:

1. Reduce the deadtime from 12 ns -> 7 ns, and eliminate the 40% muPC1 "recovery fraction." Of course, this would probably have almost no effect on the fit results, because both 7 and 12 ns are far below the fit start time of 100 ns, and 12*.6 ~ 7 anyways. 2. Reduce the time-independent inefficiency from 34 ppm -> 8 ppm, in light of the results presented in http://weak0.physics.berkeley.edu/weakint/research/muons/private/tbanks_dir/TeleConf/2006Jun27/2006Jun27_updated.html The earlier inefficiency estimate of 34 ppm was based on drift histograms which included muon TPC stop candidates before fiducial cuts were applied, so I think the 34 ppm contains a lot of background junk. This means that my existing MC t-indep estimates are a very conservative 4x too high. 3. The MC code now has the capability to look at a wider breakdown of lifetime spectra background and signal contributions (pure and pure+wallstop decay signals, TIIE ABG, TDIE ABG, etc.), which would enable the disentanglgin of contributions which Peter was asking for. I have run this improved MC configuration only once with Run8 (2e9) stats: http://weak0.physics.berkeley.edu/weakint/research/muons/private/tbanks_dir/TeleConf/2006Dec12/2006Dec12.html

Finally, concerning the hypothesis that the mysterious tail in the right-hand accidental background of the drift distribution is due to deadtimes: I first raised this possibility by voice only (10/4/05 teleconf?), in the very early days of my studies and before I had time to consider the MC results more carefully. By the next teleconference I had already discarded the idea:

http://weak0.physics.berkeley.edu/weakint/research/muons/private/tbanks_dir/TeleConf/2005Oct11/2005Oct11.html

Figures 5 and 6 are the plots of interest, and I conclude that

"... it appears that a simple 30 ns deadtime isn't sufficient to replicate what we see in the Run8 drift distribution (Figure 4); you need a longer [mus] deadtime in order to see some accidental BG "spill" over into the gap between the drift distribution and pileup background."

For Peter K.: You were asking about the evidence of deadtime in the drift plots, which I present in Figures 11 and 12 of my 5/9/06 report. My October 11, 2005 worklog page above gives more explanation which you might find helpful:

"The 30 ns deadtime certainly produces a nonuniform accidental BG--it basically generates a miniature copy of the drift signal distribution. I would guess that the t-dependent accidental BG is a convolution of the drift peak with a square pulse of width=deadtime."

This is what you are seeing the in the red histogram bins underneath the main coincidence peak in Figures 11 and 12.

Regards, Tom

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback