Difference: ScatteringPK (1 vs. 8)

Revision 82011-04-22 - PeterWinter

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="MuCapGroup"
Changed:
<
<
-- PeterKammel - 18 Oct 2006
  • SET ALLOWTOPICCHANGE=Main.MuCapGroup
  • Log In or

m+p scattering

Issues

  1. Confirm that electron screening is unimport for srim calc, otherwie difference between mu+ and mu-
  2. Steve should improve UIUC analysis of this issue, incl Run10 Data.
  3. The scattering angle dependence of Tom's treatment is rather uncertain. His determination of scatter finding efficiency is dominated by smaller angle scatters. The more dangerous scatters might be large angle, where the efficiency is not well determined.
  4. The angular distribution of incident muons is not taken into account in his Gaussian smearing method. It might be important.
  5. The stopping distribution of scattered muons on different wall materials is not calculated.

Goals of further studies

  1. Finish Steve's studies
  2. Full Srim with muons entering through Be window using Bernhard's beam description
  3. More differential comparison of data and srim
  4. Bernhard's gmu MC with Srim scattered muons as initial sample.

SRIM data, first production

directory file condition Nmuon
pencil_dp04 run0.dat.tar.gz pencil, dp=0.4 1E6
pencil_dp04 run1.dat.tar.gz pencil, dp=0.4 1E6
pencil_dp04 run2.dat.tar.gz pencil, dp=0.4 1E6
pencil_dp04 run3.dat.tar.gz pencil, dp=0.4 1E6
pencil_dp04 run4.dat.tar.gz pencil, dp=0.4 1E6
pencil_dp04 runx.dat.tar.gz pencil, dp=0.0 5E6

On pencil_dp04 there is the pencil_dp04_input_dos.tar.gz file which contains the input conditions for the run[0-4] data. It has the format

    Event Atom Energy Depth Lateral-Position ------- Atom Direction -------
    Name Numb __(eV)__ _X_()_ _Y_()_ _Z_()_ Cos(X) Cos(Y) Cos(Z)
   
The event name has five characters. I used the hex representation of the event number for this, which limits a run to ~1E6 events. The file has already been converted to dos format, so probably it needs a dos2unix for linux processing.

SRIM DATA, second production

2/12/2007. ~10M SRIM production data with adjusted energy spread according to TRIM.IN. The production took place on HP notebook, running for a few days. TRIM.dat files were produced locally. I have posted the srim tar file at the usual directory. The file is pencil.tar.gz. COLLISION, RANGE_3D are clear, TRIM.. are the input files for 1M srim events each with independent random numbers. COLLISION.5 and 9 had some reading problem, so I stored only the shorter, readable portion.

one,mpscattering> tar tvzf pencil.tar.gz
drwxr-xr-x Peter/None        0 2007-02-11 12:27:46 pencil/
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1250379238 2007-02-07 10:52:51 pencil/COLLISON.0
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1250388415 2007-02-07 18:00:29 pencil/COLLISON.1
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1250377145 2007-02-08 09:08:36 pencil/COLLISON.2
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1250368154 2007-02-08 16:33:04 pencil/COLLISON.3
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1250376054 2007-02-09 07:22:13 pencil/COLLISON.4
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1108688896 2007-02-11 12:18:00 pencil/COLLISON.5
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1250399666 2007-02-10 00:00:24 pencil/COLLISON.6
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1250361336 2007-02-10 10:12:15 pencil/COLLISON.7
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1250374277 2007-02-10 22:15:08 pencil/COLLISON.8
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  493125632 2007-02-11 12:23:41 pencil/COLLISON.9
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45909166 2007-02-07 10:52:51 pencil/RANGE_3D.0
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45912294 2007-02-07 18:00:29 pencil/RANGE_3D.1
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45912984 2007-02-08 09:08:36 pencil/RANGE_3D.2
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45909764 2007-02-08 16:33:04 pencil/RANGE_3D.3
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45911788 2007-02-09 07:22:13 pencil/RANGE_3D.4
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45910776 2007-02-09 14:40:27 pencil/RANGE_3D.5
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45910546 2007-02-10 00:00:24 pencil/RANGE_3D.6
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45911512 2007-02-10 10:12:14 pencil/RANGE_3D.7
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45909534 2007-02-10 22:15:08 pencil/RANGE_3D.8
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45911742 2007-02-11 10:17:15 pencil/RANGE_3D.9
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 16:36:39 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.0
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 16:46:14 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.1
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 16:51:43 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.2
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 16:56:59 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.3
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 17:02:17 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.4
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 17:08:45 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.5
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 17:14:49 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.6
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 17:25:27 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.7
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 17:32:10 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.8
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 17:38:51 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.9

Range of recoil protons in TPC gas

Erec (keV) Range (um)
80 318
100 388
150 595

Thus recoil unlikely to have EH on two anodes (considering also 3D recoil distribution). What is the EH #anodes multiplicity distribution for stop and scatter events? Can one suppress scatter without missing too many good stops with #EH anode>1?

100r.png 100d.png
>
>
Please go to https://muon.npl.washington.edu/twiki/bin/view/Main/ScatteringPK
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" autoattached="1" comment="" date="1171391196" name="100d.png" path="100d.png" size="7136" user="Main.PeterKammel" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" autoattached="1" comment="" date="1171389969" name="100r.bmp" path="100r.bmp" size="696398" user="Main.PeterKammel" version="1"

Revision 72007-02-13 - PeterKammel

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="MuCapGroup"
-- PeterKammel - 18 Oct 2006
  • SET ALLOWTOPICCHANGE=Main.MuCapGroup
Line: 17 to 17
 
  1. Full Srim with muons entering through Be window using Bernhard's beam description
  2. More differential comparison of data and srim
  3. Bernhard's gmu MC with Srim scattered muons as initial sample.
Changed:
<
<

Srim analysis

>
>

SRIM data, first production

 
Line: 40 to 40
  The event name has five characters. I used the hex representation of the event number for this, which limits a run to ~1E6 events. The file has already been converted to dos format, so probably it needs a dos2unix for linux processing.
Changed:
<
<
  • Update 2/12/2007. ~10M SRIM production data with adjusted energy spread. I have posted the srim tar file at the usual directory. The file is pencil.tar,gz. COLLISION, RANGE_3D are clear, TRIM.. are the input files for 1M srim events each with independent random numbers. COLLISION.5 and 9 had some reading problem, so I stored only the shorter, readable portion.
>
>

SRIM DATA, second production

2/12/2007. ~10M SRIM production data with adjusted energy spread according to TRIM.IN. The production took place on HP notebook, running for a few days. TRIM.dat files were produced locally. I have posted the srim tar file at the usual directory. The file is pencil.tar.gz. COLLISION, RANGE_3D are clear, TRIM.. are the input files for 1M srim events each with independent random numbers. COLLISION.5 and 9 had some reading problem, so I stored only the shorter, readable portion.

 
one,mpscattering> tar tvzf pencil.tar.gz

Line: 76 to 80
 -rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 100000141 2007-02-06 17:32:10 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.8 -rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 100000141 2007-02-06 17:38:51 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.9
Added:
>
>

Range of recoil protons in TPC gas

Erec (keV) Range (um)
80 318
100 388
150 595

Thus recoil unlikely to have EH on two anodes (considering also 3D recoil distribution). What is the EH #anodes multiplicity distribution for stop and scatter events? Can one suppress scatter without missing too many good stops with #EH anode>1?

100r.png 100d.png

META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" autoattached="1" comment="" date="1171391196" name="100d.png" path="100d.png" size="7136" user="Main.PeterKammel" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" autoattached="1" comment="" date="1171389969" name="100r.bmp" path="100r.bmp" size="696398" user="Main.PeterKammel" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" autoattached="1" comment="" date="1171387187" name="TRIM.IN" path="TRIM.IN" size="1379" user="Main.PeterKammel" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" autoattached="1" comment="" date="1171389938" name="100d.bmp" path="100d.bmp" size="703614" user="Main.PeterKammel" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attr="" autoattached="1" comment="" date="1171391226" name="100r.png" path="100r.png" size="9653" user="Main.PeterKammel" version="1"

Revision 62007-02-13 - PeterKammel

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="MuCapGroup"
-- PeterKammel - 18 Oct 2006
  • SET ALLOWTOPICCHANGE=Main.MuCapGroup
Line: 40 to 40
  The event name has five characters. I used the hex representation of the event number for this, which limits a run to ~1E6 events. The file has already been converted to dos format, so probably it needs a dos2unix for linux processing. \ No newline at end of file
Added:
>
>
  • Update 2/12/2007. ~10M SRIM production data with adjusted energy spread. I have posted the srim tar file at the usual directory. The file is pencil.tar,gz. COLLISION, RANGE_3D are clear, TRIM.. are the input files for 1M srim events each with independent random numbers. COLLISION.5 and 9 had some reading problem, so I stored only the shorter, readable portion.

one,mpscattering> tar tvzf pencil.tar.gz
drwxr-xr-x Peter/None        0 2007-02-11 12:27:46 pencil/
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1250379238 2007-02-07 10:52:51 pencil/COLLISON.0
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1250388415 2007-02-07 18:00:29 pencil/COLLISON.1
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1250377145 2007-02-08 09:08:36 pencil/COLLISON.2
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1250368154 2007-02-08 16:33:04 pencil/COLLISON.3
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1250376054 2007-02-09 07:22:13 pencil/COLLISON.4
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1108688896 2007-02-11 12:18:00 pencil/COLLISON.5
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1250399666 2007-02-10 00:00:24 pencil/COLLISON.6
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1250361336 2007-02-10 10:12:15 pencil/COLLISON.7
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None 1250374277 2007-02-10 22:15:08 pencil/COLLISON.8
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  493125632 2007-02-11 12:23:41 pencil/COLLISON.9
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45909166 2007-02-07 10:52:51 pencil/RANGE_3D.0
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45912294 2007-02-07 18:00:29 pencil/RANGE_3D.1
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45912984 2007-02-08 09:08:36 pencil/RANGE_3D.2
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45909764 2007-02-08 16:33:04 pencil/RANGE_3D.3
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45911788 2007-02-09 07:22:13 pencil/RANGE_3D.4
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45910776 2007-02-09 14:40:27 pencil/RANGE_3D.5
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45910546 2007-02-10 00:00:24 pencil/RANGE_3D.6
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45911512 2007-02-10 10:12:14 pencil/RANGE_3D.7
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45909534 2007-02-10 22:15:08 pencil/RANGE_3D.8
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None   45911742 2007-02-11 10:17:15 pencil/RANGE_3D.9
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 16:36:39 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.0
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 16:46:14 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.1
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 16:51:43 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.2
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 16:56:59 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.3
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 17:02:17 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.4
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 17:08:45 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.5
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 17:14:49 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.6
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 17:25:27 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.7
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 17:32:10 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.8
-rwxr-xr-x Peter/None  100000141 2007-02-06 17:38:51 pencil/TRIM_E2.18_dE0.40.9

Revision 52006-10-20 - PeterKammel

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="MuCapGroup"
-- PeterKammel - 18 Oct 2006
  • SET ALLOWTOPICCHANGE=Main.MuCapGroup
Line: 18 to 18
 
  1. More differential comparison of data and srim
  2. Bernhard's gmu MC with Srim scattered muons as initial sample.

Srim analysis

Added:
>
>
  • Bernhard's email on beam initial conditions used for Geant.
 

Revision 42006-10-19 - PeterKammel

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="MuCapGroup"
-- PeterKammel - 18 Oct 2006
  • SET ALLOWTOPICCHANGE=Main.MuCapGroup
Line: 19 to 19
 
  1. Bernhard's gmu MC with Srim scattered muons as initial sample.

Srim analysis

Changed:
<
<
>
>
  • SRIM production data is on directory
    The tedious production procedure is documented here.
 
directory file condition Nmuon
pencil_dp04 run0.dat.tar.gz pencil, dp=0.4 1E6
Line: 34 to 35
 
    Event	Atom	Energy	Depth	Lateral-Position	------- Atom Direction -------
    Name	Numb	__(eV)__	_X_()_	_Y_()_	_Z_()_	Cos(X)	Cos(Y)	Cos(Z)

Added:
>
>
  The event name has five characters. I used the hex representation of the event number for this, which limits a run to ~1E6 events. The file has already been converted to dos format, so probably it needs a dos2unix for linux processing.

Revision 32006-10-19 - PeterKammel

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="MuCapGroup"
-- PeterKammel - 18 Oct 2006
  • SET ALLOWTOPICCHANGE=Main.MuCapGroup
Line: 18 to 18
 
  1. More differential comparison of data and srim
  2. Bernhard's gmu MC with Srim scattered muons as initial sample.

Srim analysis

Changed:
<
<
>
>
directory file condition Nmuon
pencil_dp04 run0.dat.tar.gz pencil, dp=0.4 1E6
pencil_dp04 run1.dat.tar.gz pencil, dp=0.4 1E6
pencil_dp04 run2.dat.tar.gz pencil, dp=0.4 1E6
pencil_dp04 run3.dat.tar.gz pencil, dp=0.4 1E6
pencil_dp04 run4.dat.tar.gz pencil, dp=0.4 1E6
pencil_dp04 runx.dat.tar.gz pencil, dp=0.0 5E6

On pencil_dp04 there is the pencil_dp04_input_dos.tar.gz file which contains the input conditions for the run[0-4] data. It has the format

    Event	Atom	Energy	Depth	Lateral-Position	------- Atom Direction -------
    Name	Numb	__(eV)__	_X_()_	_Y_()_	_Z_()_	Cos(X)	Cos(Y)	Cos(Z)
   
The event name has five characters. I used the hex representation of the event number for this, which limits a run to ~1E6 events. The file has already been converted to dos format, so probably it needs a dos2unix for linux processing.

Revision 22006-10-18 - PeterKammel

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="MuCapGroup"
-- PeterKammel - 18 Oct 2006
  • SET ALLOWTOPICCHANGE=Main.MuCapGroup
Line: 7 to 7
 

m+p scattering

Issues

Added:
>
>
  1. Confirm that electron screening is unimport for srim calc, otherwie difference between mu+ and mu-
 
  1. Steve should improve UIUC analysis of this issue, incl Run10 Data.
  2. The scattering angle dependence of Tom's treatment is rather uncertain. His determination of scatter finding efficiency is dominated by smaller angle scatters. The more dangerous scatters might be large angle, where the efficiency is not well determined.
  3. The angular distribution of incident muons is not taken into account in his Gaussian smearing method. It might be important.
Line: 17 to 18
 
  1. More differential comparison of data and srim
  2. Bernhard's gmu MC with Srim scattered muons as initial sample.

Srim analysis

Added:
>
>

Revision 12006-10-18 - PeterKammel

Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="MuCapGroup"
-- PeterKammel - 18 Oct 2006
  • SET ALLOWTOPICCHANGE=Main.MuCapGroup
  • Log In or

m+p scattering

Issues

  1. Steve should improve UIUC analysis of this issue, incl Run10 Data.
  2. The scattering angle dependence of Tom's treatment is rather uncertain. His determination of scatter finding efficiency is dominated by smaller angle scatters. The more dangerous scatters might be large angle, where the efficiency is not well determined.
  3. The angular distribution of incident muons is not taken into account in his Gaussian smearing method. It might be important.
  4. The stopping distribution of scattered muons on different wall materials is not calculated.

Goals of further studies

  1. Finish Steve's studies
  2. Full Srim with muons entering through Be window using Bernhard's beam description
  3. More differential comparison of data and srim
  4. Bernhard's gmu MC with Srim scattered muons as initial sample.

Srim analysis

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback