-- PeterKammel - 08 Apr 2009

**p. 5:** Alternative one can determine muon distribution as function of time as

f(z,t)= Integral[ g(z') rho(z-z',t) dz']

where g(z') is the accepted muon stopping distribution on anode i. It we define z=0 as the 2 mm upstream from the i anode, the time distributions would be

n_k=Integral[f(z,t) dz, {z, w*k, w*(k+1)}]

where k= -1,0,1.

So there is no detector resolution function, but the only fit parameters account for the shape of g(z).

This formulation should be compared.

**p. 6** It is not clear to me why eps_-1 is not equal eps_+1 after summation.

**p.8 **The multi EVH analysis seems consistent, once one takes the mean z. What is the fraction of multi EVH ?

**p.5**: why does the figure capture say fit, is not that data?

**p.16**: the del Z= +-2 are a nice prediction, does that agree with the data?

**Finally**, what is the prediction for a del Y analysis, based on the neutron timing for the capture events?

Edit | Attach | ~~Watch~~ | Print version | History: r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | Raw edit | More topic actions

Topic revision: r1 - 2009-04-08 - PeterKammel

Copyright © 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.

Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback

Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback